翻页 夜间
首页 > 极度隐私 > 学校2015

俄罗斯转盘

BJP slams Sisodia for show of strength before CBI appearance_我的网站

白露

一 |     New Delhi Oct 17 ( UNI) BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra on Monday slammed Aam Aadmi Party leader and Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia for conducting a roadshow ahead of appearing before the CBI for questioning in the alleged Delhi new excise policy scam case.

"The way Manish Sisodia was raising slogans in an open car on the streets along with his supporters today, it seems as if Aam Aadmi Party has won the World Cup of corruption," Patra said here at a press conference at the BJP headquarters.

His remarks followed a massive rally by the AAP supporters for Sisodia, who is the number one accused in the alleged liquor policy scam. The rally took place en route to CBI headquarters.

Comparing the show of strength with the Congress party, Patra said, When Rahul Gandhi was called in the corruption case, in the same way the Congress party was engaged in demonstrations, adding that It will not be an exaggeration to say that this celebration is corruption.

Calling the AAP -- the most "dishonest" party-- Patra said , "Manish Sisodia ji, I want to ask are you the same party which had agitated against corruption with Anna Hazare ji. Throughout India, you took a pledge that we will fight against corruption but today your party has emerged as the most dishonest party."

Sisodia arrived at the probe agency headquarters around 11.30 am and was taken straight to the first floor of the Anti Corruption Branch.

Delhi Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena had recommended a CBI probe into alleged irregularities in the formulation and execution of the new excise policy, which was brought out in November last year.

UNI JA ING。    

【环球时报特约记者 刘皓然】美国哥伦比亚大学近日因数据造假声誉受损,排名从全美第2跌落至第18名。哥大这个重磅丑闻不仅轰动全美教育界,还引发了媒体舆论对该国奉行了近40年的高校评级体系——即《美国新闻与世界报道》杂志的年度大学排名产生了严重怀疑。事实上,近年来因造假“翻车”的美国高校不胜枚举,其中不乏百年名校。有媒体批评称,单一机构近乎垄断的话语权令各高校受到了裹挟,造假几乎是不可避免的事情。

二 | 据美国《纽约时报》13日报道,本月8日,哥伦比亚大学发布声明,承认该校之前向《美国新闻与世界报道》提交的相关数据存在夸大情节,其中“水分”最大的正是该校最为注重的研究生“小班教学”质量。对此,校领导层“深表歉意”并承诺作出改善。

三 | 《纽约时报》质疑道,高等学府的教育质量是否能如电影打分那样,仅凭一个数字加以衡量?美国高等教育问题专家斯科特·亚希克曾批评道,教育质量的评判原本应该是细致入微的工作,但各类机构的排名体系过于“简单粗暴”。早年的一项教育调研显示,只有14%的招生部门负责人认同高校排名能够对学生报考高校起到积极作用,超过半数受访者认为这类排名在“误人子弟”。尽管《美国新闻与世界报道》的排名机制争议不断,但其在这一领域拥有近乎垄断的话语权。有业内人士表示,该杂志的高校评级标准虽然多达16条,但最为直观的几条无非是招生人数、经费数额以及银行信用等,这些都是可以“人为操控”的。于是,一些高校积极利用规则进行“内卷”,有的学校会引入一些“肤浅且适得其反”的制度来强行提升排名,而这些举措往往与教育质量毫无关联。在这场排名博弈中,确实有一些名不见经传的高校实现了“逆袭”。但另一方面,也有多所高校因造假“翻车”:2012年,美国名校埃默里大学公开承认谎报学生“高考”成绩、平均绩点及其他学业表现,并承认这一操作已持续多年;同年,克莱蒙特·麦肯纳学院一名副校长承认多年谎报录取数据;2021年,美国天普大学福克斯商学院前院长波拉特更是因为电信诈骗、屡次造假而被定罪。不过也有不同意见认为,尽管高校排名体制硬伤很多,但其也为高校竞争力的数据标准化作出了贡献。

Current article:http://vobt3.tichannangenzhuchuapin.cfd/caixn/j7d.html

Published on:01:14:51